piers morgan names two royals in race fight

On his TalkTV show tonight, Piers Morgan named the two senior royals who Omid Scobie claims were the ones ‘with concerns’ over Prince Archie’s skin colour

Daniel Whyte III, President of Gospel Light Society International, who was not going to comment on this new foolishness from Harry and Meghan until Piers Morgan did what he did yesterday, says as he has said before, Harry and Meghan and now, their friend Omid Scobie, who has a strange resemblance to Peter Pan, are not mature adults and should not be taken seriously. With that said, Daniel Whyte III says again–King Charles III should have never been King in the first place because he is not only divorced and remarried, but he committed adultery with this woman while she was married to her husband and took her from her husband, and all of the Kingdom knows he should not rule over the Kingdom and the Church of England. Now, the demonic WOKE machine he has supported and promoted for years will call for his head if it is true that he said anything regarding the color of Archie’s skin because over half of his subjects are black. In fact, the WOKE community will demand he ABDICATE THE THRONE. And if it is true, the beautiful Queen-like Kate allowed her insecurity to say anything negative about her sister-in-law’s son in connection to skin color–she will never be Queen of Great Britain because over half of the Monarchy’s subjects are black. THE MONARCHY AS WE KNOW IT IS OVER!

Whyte says it was going to be over, anyway because some of the black nations under the Monarchy were asking for reparations and were in the process of leaving the Kingdom. This is going to expedite that process, and the King is left with “No Clothes On” to stop it. If King Charles III made a racist remark regarding his black grandson, who is one of the heirs to the throne, he would not be able to show his face in public for the rest of his life. Always remember, God has a way to stop what He does not want in HIS Kingdom.

Whyte says in light of all he has said, he believes the world is very sick to listen to and take seriously people like Harry, Meghan, and (Sir Peter Pan) Omid Scobie. Whyte says we live in a very sick world if people are taking the time to read about what these wannabes have to say. Whyte says he never thought he would say this, but “GET A LIFE PEOPLE!” and “GET A GRIP!”

Consequences CD Series + Kingdom Values Book

The King’s Palace is ‘utterly dismayed’ as Piers Morgan NAMES two royals at the center of race fight: Furious officials take legal advice after Omid Scobie’s book ‘mistakenly’ identifies pair and accuses them of having ‘concerns’ over Archie’s skin color.

The monarchy is understood to be ‘utterly dismayed’ after Piers Morgan named the two senior royals who Omid Scobie claimed had ‘concerns’ over Prince Archie‘s skin colour on UK television last night.

Meghan Markle first made the claim in the Sussexes’ infamous 2021 Oprah Winfrey interview when she revealed there were ‘several conversations’ between herself, Harry and Royal Family members about ‘how dark’ Archie’s skin would be.

The Dutch translation of Mr Scobie’s book Endgame appeared to reveal the name of the person alleged to have made the comment. Pictured: Omid Scobie

While the Duchess of Sussex chose not to name them amid fears it would ‘damage’ their reputation, Morgan last night identified the royals accused on his Talk TV show – and he followed the claim up by posting it to his 8.7million social media followers.

On Tuesday it emerged that a Dutch translation of Scobie’s book containing the names had gone on sale in the Netherlands. Its publisher was forced to withdraw and pulp copies amid much-mocked claims that it was an error in translation.

Copies of the book Endgame by British journalist and writer Omid Scobie are sold at a bookstore in London. The Dutch edition of book on the British royal family has been temporarily removed from the shelves in the Netherlands over an error

The two senior royals accused had not been publicly named here until Morgan’s move last night.

Royal commentators have told MailOnline that it was ‘the wrong thing to do’, describing Morgan’s stunt as ‘shameful’, ‘spiteful’ and ‘nasty’. They also hit out at Scobie’s book Endgame, which one described as a ‘rant against the Royal Family’.

The Royal Family is understood to be ‘considering all options’, including legal action – as royal sources told The Mirror there was ‘utter dismay’ at Buckingham Palace after the names quickly went viral on social media.

</div>

Morgan tried to justify his decision by arguing he was reacting to the witch-hunt caused by Harry and Meghan’s decision to air the race issue without giving any context or allowing a right to reply. The Royal Family later said the allegations were concerning but that ‘recollections may vary’.

The row has been reignited this week by Omid Scobie’s ‘poisonous’ royal book on the monarchy in which he said there was not one, but two senior royals, identified by the Duchess of Sussex in letters she subsequently wrote to King Charles on the issue the following year.

Morgan argued that it would enable people in the UK to have a ‘more open debate about this whole farrago’, saying: ‘Because I don’t believe any racist comments were ever made by any of the Royal Family, and until there is actual evidence of those comments being made, I will never believe it.

‘But now we can start the process of finding out if they ever got uttered, what the context was, and whether there was any racial intent at all – like I say, I don’t believe there was. The royals who are named in this book are …’

The Mail has chosen at this stage not to name the individuals involved and has redacted his quotes.

Prince Archie is pictured with his parents at his christening in this official photograph taken in July 2019

Morgan’s decision is likely to spark anger and disappointment at Buckingham Palace which had refused to be drawn on the row sparked by Scobie’s book and had likely been hoping that gossip on the subject would be restricted to internet and social media chatter.

Royal commentator Angela Levin told MailOnline: ‘I think it’s the wrong thing to do, because that, in a way, is helping Harry and Meghan to smirch the royals… to punish the royals and humiliate them.’

She said that Buckingham Palace will be ‘horrified’ by Morgan’s comments, adding: ‘It’s just so unnecessary and spiteful and nasty.

‘I think it’s very wrong of him to name it. I think we should all keep our mouths shut because we’re not on Omid’s side are we? He’s certainly not. He’s not on Harry’s or Meghan’s side, and I think it’s therefore a mistake.’

Fellow royal commentator Richard Fitzwilliams agreed that Morgan ‘should not have named them’ and said that ‘the circumstances of this are extremely serious’.

He told MailOnline: ‘To suddenly seize the nation’s attention and propel yourself forward in this way, I think, is absolutely shameful, and it just shows that certain individuals would do anything to get publicity.’

Mr Fitzwilliams described Scobie’s book as a ‘rant against the royal family’ and said this is ‘precisely what he wanted to happen’. ‘It just so happens that he’s got this from Piers Morgan,’ he added.

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle with their baby son Archie in South Africa in September 2019

He continued: ‘The circumstances which led to the names appearing in the Dutch copy of Endgame have not been explained and must surely involve Scobie in being told the names by the Sussexes, rather than friends of as it is so sensitive.

‘Yet they both deny collaboration, this surely be false. In his book Scobie makes clear he thinks the monarchy is in decline, possibly terminal decline.

‘He has taken a chance in weird circumstances to embarrass it. He has been aided by the appalling judgement of Piers Morgan in speaking out.’

Mr Fitzwilliams said that Piers could have chosen to hold off which ‘would have given the Palace and others a chance to collect their faults and see what they wanted to do’ but has instead caused a ‘very considerable furore’.

Sussex insiders have said that Harry and Meghan had nothing to do with Scobie’s book. Scobie has been friendly with the Duke and Duchess of Sussex in the past and co-wrote their biography Finding Freedom.

Royal author Phil Dampier said that withholding the name of the royals until now ‘has been incredibly unfair to other members of the Royal Family because speculation has been rife’.

He added: ‘They simply were making an inquiry or an observation that apparently is perfectly normal and acceptable among many black and mixed race families.

‘Harry himself has rode back and said he and Meghan never accused anybody of being racists. So the whole thing has been blown up out of all proportion and maybe in some ways it’s better to be out in open so we can have a frank and honest discussion about it.’

Mr Dampier believes that the Royal Family may have to change the late Queen’s policy of ‘never complain, never explain’, adding: ‘I think they will be scratching their heads at Buckingham Palace and wondering what the best thing to do about this is.’

He continued: ‘The fact these names have been out on the internet in this world we live in… is farcical and therefore I can understand why Piers has done this. But whether it was a wise thing to do only time will tell.’

Scobie claimed in the English version of his book Endgame that although he knew the names of the two individuals involved – and had hinted even more clues heavily on US media in recently days – he could not name them because of strict libel laws in the UK.

Meanwhile pressure was mounting on Scobie last night to explain how a second member of the Royal Family was named in a Dutch translation of his book.

Neither Meghan nor Prince Harry have named the individual involved since talking about it in their bombshell 2021 Oprah Winfrey interview, prompting fevered speculation over the identity of the ‘royal racist’.

Scobie and his Netherlands-based publishers were forced to pull the book from the shelves and put its launch on hold but dismissed it as a ‘translation error’. Scobie then insisted on Dutch television that ‘there was no version from me in which names were mentioned’.

Yesterday, however, it emerged that a second name had also been published in the Dutch version – 200 pages later – alongside a repeat of the first. And this time it was not just a word, but a sentence.

It read: ‘Even after Meghan and Charles by letter discussed about possible unconscious bias within the family, after it was revealed that…[redacted] and… [redacted] had participated in these kinds of discussions about Archie,.. [redacted] avoided discussing the subject with… [redacted].’

Source: Daily Mail Online